Ross v. State

942 So. 2d 1024, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20357, 2006 WL 3499003
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 6, 2006
DocketNo. 4D03-3838
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 942 So. 2d 1024 (Ross v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. State, 942 So. 2d 1024, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20357, 2006 WL 3499003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

[1025]*1025 ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court which quashed our earlier decision reported at Ross v. State, 912 So.2d 4 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). On the authority of State v. Richardson, 915 So.2d 86 (Fla.2005), we affirm the habitual felony offender sentence.

GROSS, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. State
942 So. 2d 1024 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
942 So. 2d 1024, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20357, 2006 WL 3499003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.