Ross v. State

291 So. 2d 248, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7902
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 325 So. 2d 430
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1974·No. No. 73-1227·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. State, 291 So. 2d 248, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7902 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

291 So. 2d 248 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)