Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Ross v. State

191 So. 509, 140 Fla. 191, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1082

DecidedOctober 6, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 509 (Ross v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. State, 191 So. 509, 140 Fla. 191, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1082 (Fla. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

To a judgment of conviction of manslaughter under an information charging murder in the second degree, defendant sued out writ of error and, on review, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

The evidence as disclosed by the bill of exceptions has been examined and is found to be amply sufficient to support the judgment.

An examination of the entire record fails to disclose reversible error.

Judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section' 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI