Ross v. South Dakota

Supreme Court

Ross v. South Dakota

271 U.S. 646, 46 S. Ct. 487

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 10, 1926

DocketNo. 66

StatusPublished

This text of 271 U.S. 646 (Ross v. South Dakota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. South Dakota, 271 U.S. 646, 46 S. Ct. 487 (1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed. for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448; sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671; (3) Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22; 31.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed. for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448; sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6; (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671; (3) Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22; 31.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 U.S. 646, 46 S. Ct. 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-south-dakota-scotus-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack