Ross v. South Carolina

Fourth Circuit

Ross v. South Carolina

82 F. App'x 305

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2003·No. Nos. 03-7263, 03-7277·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Norris Ross, a South Carolina pre-trial detainee, appeals from the district court’s orders accepting the reports and recommendations of a magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petitions for lack of jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. South Carolina, Nos. CA-03-2169-2; CA-03-2205-2-18AJ (D.S.C. filed Aug. 6, 2003 & entered Aug. 7, 2003; Aug. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Norris Ross, a South Carolina pre-trial detainee, appeals from the district court’s orders accepting the reports and recommendations of a magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petitions for lack of jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. South Carolina, Nos. CA-03-2169-2; CA-03-2205-2-18AJ (D.S.C. filed Aug. 6, 2003 & entered Aug. 7, 2003; Aug. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

AFFIRMED

Ross v. South Carolina, 82 F. App'x 305 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

82 F. App'x 305 (Ross v. South Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related