Ross v. Silverman

24 Misc. 762, 53 N.Y.S. 901
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Misc. 762 (Ross v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Silverman, 24 Misc. 762, 53 N.Y.S. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no evidence tending to show that the plaintiff'had any authority from the defendant to pay the premiums [763]*763of insurance for him to recover which this action is brought. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Gildersleeve and Giegerich, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Misc. 762, 53 N.Y.S. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-silverman-nyappterm-1898.