Ross v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJanuary 21, 2026
Docket22-1302V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ross v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Ross v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2026).

Opinion

$0333&$5&%

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-1302V

TAMMY ROSS, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: December 18, 2025 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for Petitioner.

Naseem Kourosh, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On September 15, 2022, Tammy Ross filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 11, 2021. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at December 9, 2025, ¶¶ 1, 2. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States, that she sustained an injury within the time period set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table, that she experienced the residual effects of her condition for more than six months, and that there has been no award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her injury. Petition at 1, 13; Stipulation at ¶¶ 1-5. Respondent denies that Petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused petitioner's alleged left shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that petitioner's current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Nevertheless, on December 9, 2025, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $99,500.00, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

TAMMY ROSS,

Petitioner,

V. No. 22-l 302V (ECF) Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETA RY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. Tammy Ross, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the Nationa l

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l Oet seq. (the "Vaccine Program").

The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's rece ipt of the

influenza (•'flu") vaccine, wh ich vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Tab le"),

42 C.F.R. § I 00.3(a).

2. Petitioner received a fl u vaccine on October 11, 202 1, in her left arm.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petition er alleges that petitioner susta ined a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (.. SIRVA") as set forth in the Tab le. Petitioner further al leges that petitioner

experienced th e residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civ il action

for damages on petitioner's beha lf as a result of petitioner's condition.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused petitioner' s alleged left shoulder injury , or any other injury ; and denies that

petitioner's current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation , and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21 (a)(I), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $99,500.00 , to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner' s counsel ' s IOL TA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21 (a)(l ), and an application , the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys ' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and petitioner's attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can

reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act

(42 U.S.C. § 1396

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a
§ 3501
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 1396
42 U.S.C. § 1396

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ross v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2026.