Ross v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ross v. Scully

138 A.D.2d 382, 525 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.2d 382 (Ross v. Scully) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. Scully, 138 A.D.2d 382, 525 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated October 12, 1986, and modified October 21, 1986, finding that he violated an institutional rule and imposing a penalty, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated February 17, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated October 12, 1986, and modified October 21, 1986, finding that he violated an institutional rule and imposing a penalty, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated February 17, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the petitioner’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.2d 382, 525 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-scully-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack