Ross v. Ross

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ross v. Ross

148 A. 920, 106 N.J. Eq. 277

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 5, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 105 N. J. Eq. 170.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, McGlennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Parker, Campbell, Vah Buskirk, Hetfield, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis, and reported in 105 N. J. Eq. 170.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, McGlennon, Kays, Dear, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Parker, Campbell, Vah Buskirk, Hetfield, JJ. 4.

Ross v. Ross, 148 A. 920, 106 N.J. Eq. 277 (N.J. 1930).

Pincite

148 A. 920 (Ross v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.