Ross v. Ross

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ross v. Ross

105 A. 894, 89 N.J. Eq. 587, 4 Stock. 587, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 348

DecidedOctober 11, 1918

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A. 894 (Ross v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. Ross, 105 A. 894, 89 N.J. Eq. 587, 4 Stock. 587, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 348 (N.J. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the view of the vice-chancellor that the proofs submitted fully justify the conclusion that the respondent was entitled to the relief sought by him in this case. The decree 'of divorce which the appellant seeks to review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We concur in the view of the vice-chancellor that the proofs submitted fully justify the conclusion that the respondent was entitled to the relief sought by him in this case. The decree 'of divorce which the appellant seeks to review will be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 12.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A. 894, 89 N.J. Eq. 587, 4 Stock. 587, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-ross-nj-1918.