Ross v. Ross

252 A.3d 966, 474 Md. 124
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 8, 2021
Docket57pc/20
StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.3d 966 (Ross v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Ross, 252 A.3d 966, 474 Md. 124 (Md. 2021).

Opinion

Circuit Court for Howard County Case No. 13-C-17-111078 Argued: June 4, 2021

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

No. 57

September Term, 2020

JARED ROSS

v.

JENNIFER ROSS

Barbera, C.J. McDonald Getty Booth Biran Harrell, Glenn T., Jr. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) Wilner, Alan, M. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned)

JJ.

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal PER CURIAM ORDER Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2021-06-08 09:43-04:00 Filed: June 8, 2021

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk JARED ROSS * IN THE

* COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* No. 57

JENNIFER ROSS * September Term, 2020

PER CURIAM ORDER

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case having been granted

and argued, it is this 8th day of June, 2021,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and

it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.3d 966, 474 Md. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-ross-md-2021.