Ross v. Pendell
This text of Ross v. Pendell (Ross v. Pendell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6727
KEVIN LEROY ROSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CARL PENDELL, Classification Supervisor at Henrico County Jail,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-00-182)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 5, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Leroy Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh McCoy Fain, III, Mary Elizabeth Davis, SPOTTS, FAIN, CHAPPELL & ANDERSON, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Kevin Leroy Ross appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Ross v. Pendell, No. CA-00-182 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ross v. Pendell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-pendell-ca4-2002.