Ross v. Pendell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 5, 2002
Docket02-6727
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ross v. Pendell (Ross v. Pendell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Pendell, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6727

KEVIN LEROY ROSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CARL PENDELL, Classification Supervisor at Henrico County Jail,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-00-182)

Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 5, 2002

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Leroy Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh McCoy Fain, III, Mary Elizabeth Davis, SPOTTS, FAIN, CHAPPELL & ANDERSON, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kevin Leroy Ross appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Ross v. Pendell, No. CA-00-182 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ross v. Pendell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-pendell-ca4-2002.