Ross v. MODERN MIRROR & GLASS COMPANY
711 N.W.2d 367, 474 Mich. 1095
This text of 711 N.W.2d 367 (Ross v. MODERN MIRROR & GLASS COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ross v. MODERN MIRROR & GLASS COMPANY, 711 N.W.2d 367, 474 Mich. 1095 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Dennis ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MODERN MIRROR & GLASS COMPANY and Transcontinental Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 367, 474 Mich. 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-modern-mirror-glass-company-mich-2006.