Ross v. Maryland State Police Licensing Division

Fourth Circuit

Ross v. Maryland State Police Licensing Division

671 F. App'x 82

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 29, 2016·No. No. 16-1809·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Hubert Ross appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Ross leave .to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. Md. State Police Licensing Div., No. 8:15-cv-01402-TDC, 2016 WL 1161078 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2016 & June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. .

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Hubert Ross appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Ross leave .to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. Md. State Police Licensing Div., No. 8:15-cv-01402-TDC, 2016 WL 1161078 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2016 & June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. .

DISMISSED

Ross v. Maryland State Police Licensing Division, 671 F. App'x 82 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 82 (Ross v. Maryland State Police Licensing Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.