Ross v. Maryland Casualty Co.

175 N.E.2d 826, 9 N.Y.2d 876
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 27, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 175 N.E.2d 826 (Ross v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Maryland Casualty Co., 175 N.E.2d 826, 9 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CMef Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Belmer v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
157 Misc. 2d 845 (New York Supreme Court, 1993)
Mandell Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America
125 Misc. 2d 390 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
American Home Assurance Co. v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
66 A.D.2d 269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co.
83 Misc. 2d 394 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 N.E.2d 826, 9 N.Y.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-maryland-casualty-co-ny-1961.