Ross v. Kingston

1 D.C. 140
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedNovember 15, 1803
StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 140 (Ross v. Kingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Kingston, 1 D.C. 140 (D.D.C. 1803).

Opinion

The Court

overruled the objection to the jurisdiction.

Mr. Jones requested further time to obtain testimony to discredit the oath of the woman: Denied, because he ought to come prepared, or to have prayed further time before the cause was heard.

Mr. Jones moved the Court to permit the father to take the child to his own house to keep and maintain it, in case the Court should adjudge him to be the father: Refused, the power of binding out being with the overseers of the poor.

Order granted, to maintain the child by paying thirty dollars per annum for nine years ; and to recognize himself in 270 dollars, with two sureties, 135 dollars each, to that effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-kingston-dcd-1803.