ROSS v. JOHNSON

District Court, D. New Jersey·Decided January 19, 2021·No. 3:17-cv-03135·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ___________________________________ MARTY ROSS, : : Petitioner, : Civ. No. 17-3135 (PGS) : v. : : STEVEN JOHNSON, et al., : MEMORANDUM & ORDER : Respondents. : ____________________________________:

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Presently pending before this Court is Petitioner’s motion to amend his habeas petition. (See ECF 34). Petitioner has attached a proposed amended habeas petition to his motion to amend. (See ECF 34 at 3-16). In his proposed amended habeas petition, Petitioner acknowledges the required Mason v. Meyers, 208 F.3d 414 (3d Cir. 2000) notice. (See id. at 34). Respondents take no position on Petitioner’s motion to amend (see ECF 35). The proposed amended habeas petition predominately rehashes some of the claims raised in the initial habeas petition, but also deletes others. Accordingly, IT IS this 19th day of January, 2021, ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to amend his habeas petition (ECF 34) is granted; and it is further ORDERED the Clerk shall enter the amended habeas petition (ECF 34 at 3-16) under a new docket entry; and it is further ORDERED Respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of this order in which to file a response to the amended habeas petition; and it is further ORDERED Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date the response to the amended habeas petition is filed by Respondents to file a reply brief; and it is further ORDERED the Clerk shall serve this order on Petitioner by regular U.S. mail.

s/Peter G. Sheridan PETER G. SHERIDAN, U.S.D.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROSS v. JOHNSON, (D.N.J. 2021).

ROSS v. JOHNSON (ROSS v. JOHNSON) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related