Ross v. J.D. Byrider Systems, Inc.
This text of 668 F. App'x 542 (Ross v. J.D. Byrider Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jerry Lee Ross appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants’ motions to dismiss Ross’ civil claims against Defendants. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R, 34(b). Because Ross’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Ross has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th [543]*543Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the deeisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-jd-byrider-systems-inc-ca4-2016.