Ross v. Hoppenheim

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ross v. Hoppenheim

458 So. 2d 93, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2319, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15750

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 1984

DocketNo. 84-332

StatusPublished

This text of 458 So. 2d 93 (Ross v. Hoppenheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. Hoppenheim, 458 So. 2d 93, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2319, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15750 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s counterclaim. Although the counterclaim may be poorly drafted, and amendments may be necessary in order for appellant to set out a claim superior to that of appellees, we believe she has sufficiently set out a claim as to the personal property involved to require a responsive pleading and she should be allowed leave to amend her claim as to the real property involved.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accord herewith.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order dismissing appellant’s counterclaim. Although the counterclaim may be poorly drafted, and amendments may be necessary in order for appellant to set out a claim superior to that of appellees, we believe she has sufficiently set out a claim as to the personal property involved to require a responsive pleading and she should be allowed leave to amend her claim as to the real property involved.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in accord herewith.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

458 So. 2d 93, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2319, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-hoppenheim-fladistctapp-1984.