Ross v. Hamlin

13 N.Y.S. 102, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 609, 59 Hun 622, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 980
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 13 N.Y.S. 102 (Ross v. Hamlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Hamlin, 13 N.Y.S. 102, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 609, 59 Hun 622, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 980 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

Although we are of the opinion that the court below have somewhat enlarged upon the decision of the general term in respect to the same complaint upon the appeal of Willett, (11 N. Y. Supp. 621,) yet we do not think that the appellants have in any respect been injured by such action of the court. They can as easily comply with the order of the special term as they could with the order of the general term. We think, under these circumstances, that the appeal taken was entirely unnecessary for the protection of the rights of the plaintiffs, and that the order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ross v. Willett
11 N.Y.S. 621 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 N.Y.S. 102, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 609, 59 Hun 622, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-hamlin-nysupct-1891.