Ross v. Goettert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ross v. Goettert

884 So. 2d 481, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14656, 2004 WL 2251873

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 2004·No. No. 4D03-381·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appellants sued appellees for damages based on common law and statu[482]*482tory claims as a result of the burglary of their home by defendant’s children. The trial court entered a final summary judgment in favor of the defendants on all claims. We reverse, as the Goetterts concede we should, the summary judgment on Count II against them, which alleged statutory claims. We affirm the summary judgment on Count I, which contained common law claims against the Goetterts and affirm as to all claims against the Holtslanders. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

FARMER, C.J., KLEIN, J. and BERGER, WILLIAM J., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appellants sued appellees for damages based on common law and statu[482]*482tory claims as a result of the burglary of their home by defendant’s children. The trial court entered a final summary judgment in favor of the defendants on all claims. We reverse, as the Goetterts concede we should, the summary judgment on Count II against them, which alleged statutory claims. We affirm the summary judgment on Count I, which contained common law claims against the Goetterts and affirm as to all claims against the Holtslanders. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

FARMER, C.J., KLEIN, J. and BERGER, WILLIAM J., Associate Judge, concur.

Ross v. Goettert, 884 So. 2d 481, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14656, 2004 WL 2251873 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

884 So. 2d 481 (Ross v. Goettert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.