Ross v. Giaccio

New York Court of Appeals

Ross v. Giaccio

427 N.E.2d 949, 54 N.Y.2d 810, 443 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3031

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 22, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 427 N.E.2d 949 (Ross v. Giaccio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. Giaccio, 427 N.E.2d 949, 54 N.Y.2d 810, 443 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3031 (N.Y. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition is not available under the circumstances of this case where there has been no act in excess of jurisdiction but only an alleged error which can be adequately reviewed on a direct appeal.

Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Chief Judge Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition is not available under the circumstances of this case where there has been no act in excess of jurisdiction but only an alleged error which can be adequately reviewed on a direct appeal.

Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Chief Judge Cooke.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

427 N.E.2d 949, 54 N.Y.2d 810, 443 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-giaccio-ny-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack