Ross v. Garraux
This text of 105 S.E. 637 (Ross v. Garraux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court having held that the trial judge erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon the ground that the movant had not presented for approval a brief of the evidence within the time allowed by law (Ross v. Garraux, 24 Ga. App. 601, 101 S. E. 700), and the Supreme Court on certiorari having reversed this judgment (Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645, 104 S. E. 907), the judgment of reversal originally rendered by this court must be vacated, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 S.E. 637, 26 Ga. App. 116, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-garraux-gactapp-1921.