Ross v. Garraux

105 S.E. 637, 26 Ga. App. 116, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 4
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 20, 1921
Docket10584
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 637 (Ross v. Garraux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Garraux, 105 S.E. 637, 26 Ga. App. 116, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 4 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

This court having held that the trial judge erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon the ground that the movant had not presented for approval a brief of the evidence within the time allowed by law (Ross v. Garraux, 24 Ga. App. 601, 101 S. E. 700), and the Supreme Court on certiorari having reversed this judgment (Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645, 104 S. E. 907), the judgment of reversal originally rendered by this court must be vacated, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., mid Sill, J., conew.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garraux v. Ross
104 S.E. 907 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Ross v. Garraux
101 S.E. 700 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 637, 26 Ga. App. 116, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-garraux-gactapp-1921.