Ross v. Garraux
105 S.E. 637, 26 Ga. App. 116, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 4
Opinion
This court having held that the trial judge erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial upon the ground that the movant had not presented for approval a brief of the evidence within the time allowed by law (Ross v. Garraux, 24 Ga. App. 601, 101 S. E. 700), and the Supreme Court on certiorari having reversed this judgment (Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645, 104 S. E. 907), the judgment of reversal originally rendered by this court must be vacated, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ross v. Garraux, 105 S.E. 637, 26 Ga. App. 116, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 4 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
105 S.E. 637 (Ross v. Garraux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garraux v. Ross
104 S.E. 907 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Ross v. Garraux
101 S.E. 700 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)