Ross v. Garcia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ross v. Garcia

19 A.D.3d 261, 796 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7031

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 23, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. [262] York, J.), entered on or about December 10, 2003, which confirmed the Special Referee’s report finding that the court had jurisdiction to enter the subject default judgment against defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Special Referee’s finding, essentially one of credibility, that plaintiffs process server personally delivered the summons and complaint to defendant on November 2,1989 has substantial support in the record and was properly confirmed (see European Am. Bank & Trust Co. v H. Frenkel, Ltd., 163 AD2d 154 [1990]). Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Andrias, Sullivan and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. [262] York, J.), entered on or about December 10, 2003, which confirmed the Special Referee’s report finding that the court had jurisdiction to enter the subject default judgment against defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Special Referee’s finding, essentially one of credibility, that plaintiffs process server personally delivered the summons and complaint to defendant on November 2,1989 has substantial support in the record and was properly confirmed (see European Am. Bank & Trust Co. v H. Frenkel, Ltd., 163 AD2d 154 [1990]). Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Andrias, Sullivan and Sweeny, JJ.

Ross v. Garcia, 19 A.D.3d 261, 796 N.Y.S.2d 916, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

19 A.D.3d 261 (Ross v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related