Ross v. Framingham
This text of Ross v. Framingham (Ross v. Framingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 99-1649
GERSHON ROSS; MARLENE W. ROSS; AS GUARDIAN FOR GERSHON ROSS,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
THE FRAMINGHAM SCHOOL COMMITTEE; TOWN OF FRAMINGHAM; MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Marlene W. Ross on brief pro se. Aaron K. Bikofsky, Philip B. Benjamin and Bikofsky & White on brief for appellees.
June 23,2000 Per Curiam. We have carefully read the parties'
submissions and have reviewed the district court and
administrative records. Based on our review, we find that
the decision to grant the defendants' motions for summary
judgment was without error. We therefore affirm the
judgement of the district court for essentially the reasons
stated in its opinion, Ross v. Framingham School Comm., 44
F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Mass. 1999).
Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ross v. Framingham, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-framingham-ca1-2000.