Ross v. Framingham

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 99-1649

GERSHON ROSS; MARLENE W. ROSS; AS GUARDIAN FOR GERSHON ROSS,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

THE FRAMINGHAM SCHOOL COMMITTEE; TOWN OF FRAMINGHAM; MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.

Marlene W. Ross on brief pro se. Aaron K. Bikofsky, Philip B. Benjamin and Bikofsky & White on brief for appellees.

June 23,2000 Per Curiam. We have carefully read the parties'

submissions and have reviewed the district court and

administrative records. Based on our review, we find that

the decision to grant the defendants' motions for summary

judgment was without error. We therefore affirm the

judgement of the district court for essentially the reasons

stated in its opinion, Ross v. Framingham School Comm., 44

F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Mass. 1999).

Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).