Ross v. De Oliveira

397 So. 2d 386, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19296
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 1981·No. No. 80-1865·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of dismissal under review is affirmed with one modification. That portion of the above order dismissing the instant action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is stricken as, in our view, the court had jurisdiction over the subject matter of this cause. See e. g., Art. V, § 5(b), Fla. Const.; §§ 26.012(2)(a), 34.01, Fla.Stat. (1979). In all other respects, the order under review is affirmed although we interpret the instant dismissal to be without prejudice to the plaintiff to attempt, if it chooses, re-service of the defendant under Sections 48.193(l)(g), 48.194, Fla.Stat. (1979), so as to secure personal jurisdiction over the defendant and thereby reactivate the present action. See e. g., Bradford White Corp. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 372 So.2d 994 (Fla.3d DCA 1979).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. De Oliveira, 397 So. 2d 386, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19296 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

397 So. 2d 386 (Ross v. De Oliveira) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradford White Corp. v. Aetna Ins. Co.
372 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)