Ross v. Cornell Steamboat Co.

Third Circuit

Ross v. Cornell Steamboat Co.

149 F. 196, 79 C.C.A. 514, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4452

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedNovember 2, 1906

DocketNo. 32

StatusPublished

This text of 149 F. 196 (Ross v. Cornell Steamboat Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. Cornell Steamboat Co., 149 F. 196, 79 C.C.A. 514, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4452 (3d Cir. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are cross-appeals from a final decree of the District Court for the District of New Jersey in a cause civil and maritime.

The libelant was the owner of a dredge, and in his libel he sought to recover damages from the respondent for a collision between the dredge, which was anchored in the Hudson river, and one or more of a string of barges in tow of the respondent’s steamboat. The court below found both parties at fault, and divided the damages between them. In approving this decision, we adopt the reasoning of the learned judge upon which it is founded, as set forth in the full and satisfactory opinion filed by him and to be found in 143 Fed. 166.

The decree of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These are cross-appeals from a final decree of the District Court for the District of New Jersey in a cause civil and maritime.

The libelant was the owner of a dredge, and in his libel he sought to recover damages from the respondent for a collision between the dredge, which was anchored in the Hudson river, and one or more of a string of barges in tow of the respondent’s steamboat. The court below found both parties at fault, and divided the damages between them. In approving this decision, we adopt the reasoning of the learned judge upon which it is founded, as set forth in the full and satisfactory opinion filed by him and to be found in 143 Fed. 166.

The decree of the court below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 F. 196, 79 C.C.A. 514, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-cornell-steamboat-co-ca3-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack