Ross v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided June 17, 2022·No. 6:20-cv-00909·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PATRICIA L. ROSS, Case No. 6:20-cv-00909-SB Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA vs. COMMISSIONER, Social Security Administration, Defendant.

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties, it is ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $9,544.43 are hereby awarded to Plaintiff, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010), if the Commissioner confirms that Plaintiff owes no debt to the Government through the federal treasury offset program, payment of this award shall be made by check made payable and mailed to Plaintiffs counsel, Brent Wells, WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, P.C., 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, Oregon 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s address provided above. There are no costs or expenses to be paid herein. Dated this 17th day of June 2022. Siac Foecernay HON. STACIE F. BECKERMAN United States Magistrate Judge Proposed Order submitted by: Brent Wells WELLS, MANNING, EITENMILLER & TAYLOR, PC. 474 Willamette Street, Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 686-1969 bwells@wmetattorneys.com Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2022).

Ross v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Ross v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)