Ross v. Commissioner of Social Services, No. Cv 94 036 78 38 (Jun. 8, 1995)
This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7236 (Ross v. Commissioner of Social Services, No. Cv 94 036 78 38 (Jun. 8, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court's decision in this case is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in Matarazzo v. Rowe,
In the present case, the hearing officer denied the application for benefits on the basis that the spend down rule was not applicable. Accordingly, there was no finding of fact as to the amount of incurred expenses during the months in question. In order to determine whether the rule of Matarazzo v. Rowe applies to the plaintiff's case and to what extent, it is necessary that the case be remanded for further factual findings.
The plaintiff's appeal is sustained and the case is remanded to the department of social services for further proceedings consistent with this decision and the decision of the court in Matarazzo v. Rowe, supra.
MALONEY, J. CT Page 7237
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 7236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-commissioner-of-social-services-no-cv-94-036-78-38-jun-8-1995-connsuperct-1995.