Ross v. College of New Rochelle

190 A.D.2d 635

This text of 190 A.D.2d 635 (Ross v. College of New Rochelle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. College of New Rochelle, 190 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan J. Saks, J.), entered May 15, 1992, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The infant plaintiff suffered an eye injury when he pulled on a cord attached to a pen which was affixed to a bulletin board and was struck by a "push pin”. The IAS Court properly found that genuine triable issues of fact exist including foreseeability of harm, control of the instrumentality, and proximate cause. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 A.D.2d 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-college-of-new-rochelle-nyappdiv-1993.