Ross v. Clarke
1 U.S. 354, 1 Dall. 354
Opinion
The money is to be considered in the same state, as if it had been paid into the hands of the Sheriff. If a proceeding of this kind were allowed, there could be no end to suits. We are unanimously of opinion, that the foreign attachment has issued irregularly and ought to be quashed.
The rule made absolute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ross v. Clarke, 1 U.S. 354, 1 Dall. 354 (1788).
1 U.S. 354 (Ross v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A.
565 A.2d 448 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Howard's Estate
227 P. 1016 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1924)
Norton v. Clark
18 Nev. 247 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1884)
Hill v. Beach
12 N.J. Eq. 31 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1858)
Stratton v. Ham
8 Ind. 84 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1856)
Winton v. State ex rel. Ezra
4 Ind. 321 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1853)
Shinn v. Zimmerman
23 N.J.L. 150 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1851)
Burrill v. Letson
29 S.C.L. 378 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1844)
Corbyn v. Bollman
4 Watts & Serg. 342 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1842)
Bushel v. Commonwealth Insurance
15 Serg. & Rawle 173 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1827)
Dawson v. Holcomb
1 Ohio 275 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1824)