Ross v. Chambers
17 S.C.L. 548
This text of 17 S.C.L. 548 (Ross v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ross v. Chambers, 17 S.C.L. 548 (N.C. Ct. App. 1830).
Opinion
We concur with the presiding Judge in this case. The ordinary had no jurisdiction, as has been repeatedly rlc.cided. The sureties can know nothing of the transactions of - ® the administrator. If the estate were represented, it might appear, from vouchers to be found among the papers of the ad-m- i.sirator, that the debt was paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 S.C.L. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-chambers-ncctapp-1830.