Ross v. Cannon

2 Del. Cas. 34
CourtDelaware Court of Common Pleas
DecidedApril 15, 1808
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Del. Cas. 34 (Ross v. Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Cannon, 2 Del. Cas. 34 (Del. Super. Ct. 1808).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The pleas are inconsistent and cannot be pleaded.

N. B. The motive for putting in these pleas was to take advantage of a variance between the bond as shown on oyer and the one declared on.

The defendant’s counsel then offered the plea of nil debet in modo et forma etc. This the Court rejected likewise.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Del. Cas. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-cannon-delctcompl-1808.