Ross v. Brusie
30 P. 811, 64 Cal. 245, 12 P.C.L.J. 267, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 613
Opinion
are of opinion that the court erred in sustaining the objection on the ground of incompetency to the following question put to the plaintiff while testifying: “ Did you at any time within three years have any conversation with the defendant relative to the execution of this deed and bond?”
Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ross v. Brusie, 30 P. 811, 64 Cal. 245, 12 P.C.L.J. 267, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 613 (Cal. 1883).
30 P. 811 (Ross v. Brusie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wagg v. Herbert
1907 OK 156 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1907)
Harp v. Harp
69 P. 28 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Vance v. Anderson
45 P. 816 (California Supreme Court, 1896)