Ross v. Breeding

Texas Supreme Court

Ross v. Breeding

13 Tex. 16

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1854

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 13 Tex. 16 (Ross v. Breeding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. Breeding, 13 Tex. 16 (Tex. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Lipscomb, J.

The petition in this case contains no averment that the note sued on was the note of the defendant, nor, ¿bat he had made the same. There was a demurrer to the petition, which was overruled, and defendant appealed. That the petition is fatally defective, has been settled by the decisions of this Court, in Frazier v. Todd (4 Tex. R. 461) and in Jennings v. Moss, (Id. 452,) and acknowledged by the Court, in Jackson v. Marshall and another (6 Tex. R. 324.)

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Be versed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lipscomb, J.

The petition in this case contains no averment that the note sued on was the note of the defendant, nor, ¿bat he had made the same. There was a demurrer to the petition, which was overruled, and defendant appealed. That the petition is fatally defective, has been settled by the decisions of this Court, in Frazier v. Todd (4 Tex. R. 461) and in Jennings v. Moss, (Id. 452,) and acknowledged by the Court, in Jackson v. Marshall and another (6 Tex. R. 324.)

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Be versed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Tex. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-breeding-tex-1854.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack