Ross v. Bayer-Gardner-Himes Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ross v. Bayer-Gardner-Himes Co.

87 N.Y.S. 36, 92 A.D. 616

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 87 N.Y.S. 36 (Ross v. Bayer-Gardner-Himes Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ross v. Bayer-Gardner-Himes Co., 87 N.Y.S. 36, 92 A.D. 616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order should be modified by requiring the plaintiff, as a condition for the -service of the amended complaint, to pay to the defendant all costs in the action, except a trial fee for the trial at which a juror was withdrawn, the court having imposed the payment of such trial fee upon the plaintiff as a condition for allowing the withdrawal of the juror, and, as thus modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order should be modified by requiring the plaintiff, as a condition for the -service of the amended complaint, to pay to the defendant all costs in the action, except a trial fee for the trial at which a juror was withdrawn, the court having imposed the payment of such trial fee upon the plaintiff as a condition for allowing the withdrawal of the juror, and, as thus modified, the order should be affirmed, without costs of this appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 N.Y.S. 36, 92 A.D. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-bayer-gardner-himes-co-nyappdiv-1904.