Ross v. Bass
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7741
ANNETTE ROSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARY L. BASS, Chief of Operations; GENE M. JOHNSON, Director for DOC; BARBARA J. WHEELER, Warden for F.C.C.W.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00243-jct-mfu)
Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 24, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annette Ross, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Annette Ross appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v.
Bass, No. 7:09-cv-00243-jct-mfu (W.D. Va. Aug. 20 & Sept. 4,
2009). We deny Ross’s motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ross v. Bass (Ross v. Bass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.