Ross v. Barnett

422 So. 2d 1040, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21855
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross v. Barnett. Read the opinion of the Court — 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22782
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 1982·No. No. 82-854·Published

Opinion

FERGUSON, Judge.

Section 687.03(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1979) which raised the legal interest rate ceiling from 10% to 18% has retroactive application to loans made prior to July 1, 1979, where by terms of the contract the lender has the legal right to adjust the interest rate.1 U.P.C., Inc. v. Intercontinental Bank, 410 So.2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The $75,000 promissory note in this case, executed in 1975 provides for a fluctuating rate of interest (between 6% and 10%) pegged to a prime interest rate and is, therefore, an adjustable interest rate note which is excepted from the usury statute, notwithstanding the fact that the interest rate cannot exceed 10%. If, as contended, the appellees have exacted interest in excess of 10%, but less than 18%, the appellants have an action for breach of contract, but the interest charged in excess of 10% is not usurious.

Summary judgment granted on the usury claim is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. Barnett, 422 So. 2d 1040, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21855 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

422 So. 2d 1040 (Ross v. Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U. P. C., Inc. v. Intercontinental Bank
410 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)