Ross v. Barker

30 Mo. 385
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided July 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was for a breach of warranty of soundness in the sale of a slave, and upon the trial the court instructed the jury that the plaintiff could not recover, because there had been no offer to return the slave.

Where there was a breach of an express warranty, or a fraudulent and false representation, the liability of the vendor is not defeated by a failure on the part of the vendee to return or offer to return the property. This circumstance may affect the measure of damages, but is no bar to the action. (Fielder v. Starkie, 1 H. Black. 19.) The case of Stearns v. McCullough, 18 Mo. 414, decided by this court, recognizes this rule.

The judgment will be reversed and the case remanded; Judge Ewing concurs. Judge Scott absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. Barker, 30 Mo. 385 (Mo. 1860).

30 Mo. 385 (Ross v. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Maxwell
18 Mo. App. 176 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)