Home/Eleventh Circuit/Ross v. Bank South, N.A.

Ross v. Bank South, N.A.

848 F.2d 1132, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9693
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 10, 1988·No. Nos. 86-7350, 86-7352 and 86-7790·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion February 17, 1988, 11th Cir., 1988, 837 F.2d 980)

Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, [1133]*1133KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, CLARK and COX, Circuit Judges*.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court,in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of October 17, 1988, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. Bank South, N.A., 848 F.2d 1132, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9693 (11th Cir. 1988).

848 F.2d 1132 (Ross v. Bank South, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. FedEx National, LTL, Inc.
272 F.R.D. 611 (M.D. Florida, 2011)
Colomar v. Mercy Hospital, Inc.
242 F.R.D. 671 (S.D. Florida, 2007)
Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc. v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.
238 F.R.D. 679 (S.D. Florida, 2006)
Simpson v. Specialty Retail Concepts
149 F.R.D. 94 (M.D. North Carolina, 1993)
Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., Alston & Bird, George Miller, Individually, and as a Representative of a Class of Bondholders Described in the Complaint v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr., William v. Weldon, Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., George Miller, Individually, and as a Representative of a Class of Bondholders Described in the Complaint v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr., Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., George Miller, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr.
848 F.2d 1132 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)