Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Ross v. Axa Financial, Inc.

Ross v. Axa Financial, Inc.

88 A.D.3d 626, 931 N.Y.2d 504
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 27, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.3d 626 (Ross v. Axa Financial, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. Axa Financial, Inc., 88 A.D.3d 626, 931 N.Y.2d 504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The court properly admitted the unredacted “aided report” because there was sufficient evidence that plaintiff was the source of the information therein, including the location of the accident (see Martinez v New York City Tr. Auth., 41 AD3d 174, 175 [2007]; see also McDermott v Barker, 20 AD2d 546 [1963]). In light of this and the other evidence presented at trial, the verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence. Concur— Andrias, J.P, Sweeny, Acosta, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martinez v. New York City Transit Authority
41 A.D.3d 174 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
McDermott v. Barker
20 A.D.2d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 626, 931 N.Y.2d 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-axa-financial-inc-nyappdiv-2011.