Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/Ross v. Armour Fertilizer Works

Ross v. Armour Fertilizer Works

169 So. 101, 1936 La. App. LEXIS 308
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross v. Armour Fertilizer Works. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 So. 353 →
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 22, 1936·No. No. 16355.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our attention has been directed to the fact that the sum of $325.50 was improperly allowed as a credit against the compensation awarded the plaintiff in our decree.

Our decree will, therefore, be amended so as to disallow the credit.

Original decree amended; rehearing refused. (All applications.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 169 So. 101, 1936 La. App. LEXIS 308 (La. Ct. App. 1936).

169 So. 101 (Ross v. Armour Fertilizer Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.