Ross, R., Pets v. Americhoice Federal Credit Union
This text of Ross, R., Pets v. Americhoice Federal Credit Union (Ross, R., Pets v. Americhoice Federal Credit Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
RAYMOND ROSS, SANDRA D. : No. 40 MM 2015 DIXON-ROSS, : : Petitioners : Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus : : v. : : : AMERICHOICE FEDERAL CREDIT : UNION, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Application for
Leave to File Post-Submission Communication is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ross, R., Pets v. Americhoice Federal Credit Union, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-r-pets-v-americhoice-federal-credit-union-pa-2015.