Ross Products, Inc. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 874, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1924
United States Customs Court·Decided March 23, 1967·No. No. P67/79; protests 66/3667, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross Products, Inc. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 874, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1924 (cusc 1967).

58 Cust. Ct. 874 (Ross Products, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. Kay Co. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 130 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)