Ross Products, Inc. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 541
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross Products, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Cust. Ct. 74
United States Customs Court·Decided June 14, 1961·No. No. 65801; protest 60/27214 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “M” consist of dish mops similar in all material respects to [542]*542those the subject of Abstract 64603, the claim at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 923, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877), for manufactures of cotton, not specially provided for, by similitude, was sustained. The items marked “S,” stipulated to consist of sponges the same as those involved in Abstract 61191, were held dutiable at 12% percent under the provision in paragraph 1537(b), as modified, supra, for manufactures, wholly or in chief value of india rubber, not specially provided for, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross Products, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 541 (cusc 1961).

46 Cust. Ct. 541 (Ross Products, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.