Ross Products, Inc. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 379
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross Products, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Cust. Ct. 158 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 16, 1961·No. No. 65303; protests 60/9869 and 60/9868 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of Ross Products, Inc. v. United States (43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106) and that the items marked “B” consist of earthenware ashtrays with metal or wire holders and that the issue is the same as that in James Betesh Import Co. v. United States (40 Cust. Ct. 186, C.D. 1981), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ross Products, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 379 (cusc 1961).
46 Cust. Ct. 379 (Ross Products, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James Betesh Import Co. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 186 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)
Ross Products, Inc. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 74 (U.S. Customs Court, 1959)