Ross, M. v. Gilmore, R.
This text of Ross, M. v. Gilmore, R. (Ross, M. v. Gilmore, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
J-S28041-15
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
MALIK SABOR ROSS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant
v.
ROBERT GILMORE
Appellee No. 2048 MDA 2014
Appeal from the Order Entered October 7, 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County Civil Division at No(s): 2014-3738
BEFORE: BOWES, J., ALLEN, J., and LAZARUS, J.
JUDGMENT ORDER BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED MAY 27, 2015
On September 29, 2014, Malik Sabor Ross filed a petition for writ of
habeas corpus and a petition to proceed in forma pauperis in the Civil
Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County. On October 7,
2014, the trial court dismissed both petitions and directed Ross to refile
them in the court’s criminal division.
In his petition for habeas corpus, Ross raises issues related to the
legality of his current sentence of incarceration. Accordingly, his petition
should properly have been filed under the criminal docket number of the
case for which he is serving his sentence.
Section 5103 of the Judicial Code provides, in relevant part, as follows:
§ 5103. Transfer of erroneously filed matters
(a) General rule. -- If an appeal or other matter is taken to or brought in a court or magisterial district of this Commonwealth J-S28041-15
which does not have jurisdiction of the appeal or other matter, the court or district justice shall not quash such appeal or dismiss the matter, but shall transfer the record thereof to the proper tribunal of this Commonwealth, where the appeal or other matter shall be treated as if originally filed in the transferee tribunal on the date when the appeal or other matter was first filed in a court or magisterial district of this Commonwealth. . . .
...
(c) Interdivisional transfers. -- If an appeal or other matter is taken to, brought in, or transferred to a division of a court to which such matter is not allocated by law, the court shall not quash such appeal or dismiss the matter, but shall transfer the record thereof to the proper division of the court, where the appeal or other matter shall be treated as if originally filed in the transferee division on the date first filed in a court or magisterial district.
42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5103.
The language of section 5103 is absolute, admitting to no exceptions.
Lucidore v. Novak, 570 A.2d 93, 95 (Pa. Super. 1990). It states that a
court lacking jurisdiction shall transfer the action. Id. (emphasis added).
Further, the language states that a matter brought before the incorrect
division may not be dismissed. Id.
-2- J-S28041-15
Accordingly, the order dismissing Ross’ petition for writ of habeas
corpus and petition to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby reversed and the
case is remanded to the criminal trial division of the Court of Common Pleas
of Centre County for further proceedings. Jurisdiction relinquished.
Judgment Entered.
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary
Date: 5/27/2015
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ross, M. v. Gilmore, R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-m-v-gilmore-r-pasuperct-2015.