Ross, M. v. Gilmore, R.

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 27, 2015
Docket2048 MDA 2014
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ross, M. v. Gilmore, R. (Ross, M. v. Gilmore, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross, M. v. Gilmore, R., (Pa. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

J-S28041-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

MALIK SABOR ROSS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant

v.

ROBERT GILMORE

Appellee No. 2048 MDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered October 7, 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County Civil Division at No(s): 2014-3738

BEFORE: BOWES, J., ALLEN, J., and LAZARUS, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED MAY 27, 2015

On September 29, 2014, Malik Sabor Ross filed a petition for writ of

habeas corpus and a petition to proceed in forma pauperis in the Civil

Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County. On October 7,

2014, the trial court dismissed both petitions and directed Ross to refile

them in the court’s criminal division.

In his petition for habeas corpus, Ross raises issues related to the

legality of his current sentence of incarceration. Accordingly, his petition

should properly have been filed under the criminal docket number of the

case for which he is serving his sentence.

Section 5103 of the Judicial Code provides, in relevant part, as follows:

§ 5103. Transfer of erroneously filed matters

(a) General rule. -- If an appeal or other matter is taken to or brought in a court or magisterial district of this Commonwealth J-S28041-15

which does not have jurisdiction of the appeal or other matter, the court or district justice shall not quash such appeal or dismiss the matter, but shall transfer the record thereof to the proper tribunal of this Commonwealth, where the appeal or other matter shall be treated as if originally filed in the transferee tribunal on the date when the appeal or other matter was first filed in a court or magisterial district of this Commonwealth. . . .

...

(c) Interdivisional transfers. -- If an appeal or other matter is taken to, brought in, or transferred to a division of a court to which such matter is not allocated by law, the court shall not quash such appeal or dismiss the matter, but shall transfer the record thereof to the proper division of the court, where the appeal or other matter shall be treated as if originally filed in the transferee division on the date first filed in a court or magisterial district.

42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5103.

The language of section 5103 is absolute, admitting to no exceptions.

Lucidore v. Novak, 570 A.2d 93, 95 (Pa. Super. 1990). It states that a

court lacking jurisdiction shall transfer the action. Id. (emphasis added).

Further, the language states that a matter brought before the incorrect

division may not be dismissed. Id.

-2- J-S28041-15

Accordingly, the order dismissing Ross’ petition for writ of habeas

corpus and petition to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby reversed and the

case is remanded to the criminal trial division of the Court of Common Pleas

of Centre County for further proceedings. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 5/27/2015

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lucidore v. Novak
570 A.2d 93 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ross, M. v. Gilmore, R., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-m-v-gilmore-r-pasuperct-2015.