Ross Lawn Equipment, Inc. v. State

213 A.D.2d 1076, 625 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3952
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 1995·No. Claim No. 76586·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application denied. Memorandum: The court erred in granting claimant’s application for an additional allowance pursuant to EDPL 701, following entry and payment of the judgment (see, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v Great Bend Aggregates, 181 AD2d 998). Claimant’s reliance on Scuderi v State of New York (184 AD2d 1073) and Hakes v State of New York (184 AD2d 1035, affd 81 NY2d 392) is misplaced because timeliness was not at issue in those cases. (Appeal from Judgment of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.—Counsel Fees.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross Lawn Equipment, Inc. v. State, 213 A.D.2d 1076, 625 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 1076 (Ross Lawn Equipment, Inc. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

General Crushed Stone Co. v. State
709 N.E.2d 463 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
General Crushed Stone Co. v. State
245 A.D.2d 1142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)