Ross Associates, Inc. v. Carlson Companies
This text of 260 N.W.2d 587 (Ross Associates, Inc. v. Carlson Companies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by defendant from denial of post-trial motions and judgment for plaintiff. The case was tried before a court without a jury in Hennepin County. The court found that plaintiff was entitled to reformation of a lease entered into with defendant. Defendant’s motion for a new trial and for amended findings was denied and judgment was entered. We affirm.
No lengthy recitation of the facts in this case is necessary because it poses a simple question under Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, as to whether the trial court’s findings are clearly erroneous.
The court found that the parties ’by mutual mistake had prepared language in a lease to give it an incorrect meaning and that plaintiff had established by clear and convincing evidence that what it claims the parties intended by the lease was correct. Accordingly, plaintiff was entitled to reformation of the lease.
In reviewing the evidence we can find no basis for holding that the trial court’s findings were clearly erroneous and we must thus affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 N.W.2d 587, 1977 Minn. LEXIS 1345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-associates-inc-v-carlson-companies-minn-1977.