Ross Allen Hartwell v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00087-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
ROSS ALLEN HARTWELL, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 390th District Court of Travis County, Texas.
ORDER
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria Order Per Curiam This cause is before the Court on appellant’s pro se motion to reinstate motion for
rehearing. We denied appellant’s motion for rehearing because it violated the prohibition
against hybrid representation. On August 22, 2015, appellant filed this motion asserting
that he was not represented by counsel at the time he filed his original motion. Because
the status of appellant’s representation is unclear from the record, we GRANT appellant’s motion to reinstate and withdraw our prior disposition of July 30, 2015. After considering
appellant’s motion for rehearing on the merits, it is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 3rd day of September, 2015.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ross Allen Hartwell v. State (Ross Allen Hartwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.